Sunday, June 30, 2013

Should the “Nobel prize for food” go to a Monsanto exec?


Should the “Nobel prize for food” go to a Monsanto exec?

http://grist.org/food/should-the-nobel-prize-for-food-go-to-a-monsanto-exec/

“In a move that has disturbed many anti-hunger advocates, including the 81 global leaders of the World Future Council and laureates of the Right Livelihood Award, the World Food Prize — often known as the Nobel prize for food and agriculture — has given this year’s award to three chemical company executives, including Monsanto executive vice president and chief technology officer, Robert Fraley.
Fraley shares the prize with two other scientists responsible for launching the “technology” behind the biotech business three decades ago, after developing a method for inserting foreign genes into plants. For an award that claims to honor those who contribute to a “nutritious and sustainable food supply,” genetically modified organisms miss the mark on both counts.
GMOs do not create a more nutritious or sustainable food supply. Twenty years after the commercialization of the first GMO seed, almost all are limited to just two types. Either they’ve been developed to resist a proprietary herbicide or engineered to express a specific insecticide. (No surprise, since the product development is led by chemical companies like Monsanto and Syngenta.) While these crops have proven profitable to the companies producing them, they’ve been costly to farmers. And for the cash-poor farmers, who make up 70 percent of the world’s hungry, this technology worsens dependency on purchased seeds, fertilizer, and chemicals. As GMOs exacerbate farmers’ dependency on these inputs — all at volatile and rising prices — many small-scale farmers are driven to despair.”

Roundup: Much Worse Than We Thought

Glyphosate is damaging
Dr. Robert Kremer, a microbiologist with the USDA Agricultural Research Service has studied glyphosate and has come to several conclusions about the ways in which it is damaging.
  1. It kills beneficial microbes in the soil that keep pathogens in check.
  2. It is a food source to opportunistic bacterium and fungi (fusarium), so it promotes bad bugs.
  3. Glyphosate binds up all the nutrients in the plant so that when the plant is used for food it is nutrient deficient and the animals suffer. Any offspring from those animals are also nutrient deficient.
  4. It takes away control mechanisms in the plant so the plant cannot defend itself.
  5. It accumulate in the new growth points of plant — roots and buds.
  6. The breakdown product of glypohsate is AMPA (aminomethylphosphonic acid) which is more toxic than glyphosate. AMPA affects microbes that make nutrients available.
  7. Glyphosate filters down into the soil and any plant in the area will take up the glyphosate. If it is used to spray weeds, it can be taken up by any plants in the area of the spraying.
  8. There are 40 documented diseases that increase as a direct result of using glyphosate in all crops.
  9. As glyphosate is destroying the soil — it is also destroying the rumen of the cow — there are increasing cases of the clostridium bacterium that causes botulism occurring inside the cow. Not a pretty sight.
Glyphosate residues show up everywhere
The US Geological Service discovered glyphosate residues in significant concentrations in the air, the rain, in rivers, in streams and in lakes.
The US Geological Service found that in 2007 there were 88,000 tons of glyphosate being used — up from 11,000 in 1992. In the soil, glyphosate residues are up from .04 ppm to .08 ppm. There are residues found in corn, soybeans, soybean meal, and potatoes.
The manure taken from the CAFOS (Confined Animal Feeding Operations) show AMPA residues (metabolite of glyphosate) are up from .24 ppm to .81 ppm.
In South America Dr. Carrasco found severe skeletal deformities (cheeks, bones) in children of mothers who lived around the fields which were sprayed with glyphosate by airplane. In his own experiments he found 1 part to 3500 glyphosate caused deformities in frog and chick embryos.
French researcher Dr Gilles-Eric Seralini, documented that only 1-2 ppm can cause complete infertility of sperm and egg. Dr. Seralini again documented 2-10 ppm to cause damage to endocrine makeup of cell.
Environmental Protection Agency lowering the standards
In 1994 the EPA allowed 2 ppm of glyphosate. In 1997 they raised it to 20ppm — a 200% increase. They increased the allowance of glyphosate in sweet corn. Coincidentally (right) two months later, Roundup sweet corn was deregulated and will be on the market !
Conclusions
We have a tremendous increase in allergies and digestive disorders due to foreign indigestible proteins. We have crops deficient of nutrients. We have an increase in the growth of opportunistic organisms, an increase in immune system challenges and and increase in disease.
The companies that make these toxic chemicals are the same companies that make pharmaceuticals and chemotherapy drugs. So it comes full circle.
We use a chemical that is a poison to raise crops. The crops are fed to livestock. The livestock get sick and we have to call the vet who uses chemicals to treat them. The chemicals from the food and the chemicals from the treatment are now in the meat of the livestock that humans eat. The humans get sick and go to the hospital where they use chemicals to treat them. Full circle.
old but good article http://realfoodforager.com/roundup-much-worse-than-we-thought/#comment-27008

Saturday, June 29, 2013

How Governments Gang Up on Small Farmers and Families


New Book Documents Organized Investigations and Crackdowns Against Farmers - Chelsea Green Publishing


link
 "At a time when more and more people are turning away from a broken, industrial food system, a damning new book by food and business expert David E. Gumpert documents an expanding, organized national and state investigation and enforcement regime aimed at stopping direct sales of food between farmers and consumers.
Featuring a Foreword by rebel farmer Joel Salatin, Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Food Rights: The Escalating Battle Over Who Decides What We Eat explores the emerging conflict over whether Americans retain the right to privately buy the foods they want from farmers and neighbors—rights their grandparents and great grandparents held."

The media needs to open discussion on GMO issue by Philip Brasor

Japan times

"The new French documentary, “Tous Cobayes?” (“All of Us Guinea Pigs Now?”), screening at movie theaters and community halls throughout Japan this summer, tries to present the long-term health consequences of global commercial enterprises in their proper scientific and social contexts. It is unabashed advocacy journalism, taking the position that its two main concerns, nuclear energy and genetically modified organisms (GMO), are products of global industrial conspiracies. But while a certain paranoid tone infuses the movie’s rhetoric, its premise — that the danger of these two endeavors can only be comprehended by taking a long view — is presented with scrupulous technical authority."

here is a english subtitle clip of the film, which suspiciously wont upload in the search results from the blogger to the youtube video, maybe just a coincidence.
french documentary

The Myriad Genetics gene patenting case and GMO’s

The Myriad Genetics gene patenting case and GMO’s

June 29, 2013
The Marietta Times
 
" here are too many possible studies or claims that could be rooted in bad food, including possible links to autism in children and Alzheimer's and links to cancers in adults. It's not a funny issue and should be taken seriously, but it seems as if we haven't yet reached a tipping point. I hope it comes soon though, considering all of the dissent amongst much of the educated public against GMO's or their labeling. So, maybe the Myriad Genetics case could have some bearing on GMO's by existentially providing a crux as to the companies producing GMO's needing to show burden of proof that their patented products are completely safe for human and animal consumption and do not harm the environment. Of course it must be real science that is proven by third-parties working closely with government regulators, and no interference by Monsanto or others.
Otherwise, can't it be said that we as a population are being held hostage against our will with our food and have not been given credible evidence, simply because a company claims patents on genes that make up the greater food supply? Just think about it."

50 HARMFUL EFFECTS OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED (GM) FOODS


This article outlines the many harmful effects of GM or genetically-modified foods (known also as genetically-engineered foods) and representng lab-created GMOs or genetically-modified organisms.

 

old but good article

Deputy PM Nick Clegg calls for caution on GM crops

Deputy PM says he does not knowingly give his children GM food and favours a precautionary approach
read
"Nick Clegg has said he does not knowingly give his children GM food.
Despite a lack of evidence of any effect on human health from eating food containing GM ingredients, the deputy prime minister called for a cautious approach towards the adoption of GM crops.
Last week the environment secretary, Owen Paterson, pressed for a relaxation of strict EU rules on the cultivation of GM crops. Paterson has said GM crops are probably safer than conventional food and offer "wonderful opportunities to improve human health"."

Organic growers lose appeal for protection from Monsanto lawsuits




read

"The seed company Monsanto successfully defended itself in federal appeals court this month against more than 80 organic seed growers and trade associations.
The group sought broad protection for farmers against potential lawsuits by Monsanto down the road — in the event that their crops are inadvertently cross-pollinated with the company’s patented genetic material.
The farmers said their crops had not yet been contaminated. And Monsanto pointed to its public assurance that it would not sue farmers should cross-pollination occur."

Friday, June 28, 2013

Permaculture garden grows food for Trillium


Jun. 26, 2013

Permaculture garden grows food for Trillium

Sarah Nechamen '15 and Celine Jennison '14
Alex Koeberle
Plant science students Sarah Nechamen '15 and Celine Jennison '14 helped create a garden outside Kennedy Hall to demonstrate permaculture.
Diners at Trillium need not look farther than out the window to see where part of their meal originates.
The basil in their pasta or cilantro in their quesadilla may have been plucked from the new garden adjacent to Kennedy Hall, constructed by students last week.
The site will also enable staff and students to stroll around and learn about permaculture – a self-sustaining agricultural system in which herbs, fruits and vegetables are strategically planted so that they work together in mutual benefit. Some plants provide shade, for instance, while others offer pest resistance.http://news.cornell.edu/stories/2013/06/permaculture-garden-grows-food-trillium

why dont foodies unite? why are top chefs so quiet on GMO foods?

Top Chef Colicchio on GMO and food activism
we love food and one of our few idle time vices is watching some cooking shows on youtube. walmart dominates shows like MasterChef with embedded advertising, and then statements from Gordon Ramsey as pictured above seem to conflict with these corporate take overs of food. we understand that at the end of the day, cash rules everything around me and all but you would think that many of these chef's who really take an active role in insuring heirloom food varities and local farms for seasonal food. elsewhere Ramsey states that Chefs cooking non local, non seasonal food should be fined, and while this is a bit of a nanny state solution, its certainly in the right direction. foodies and chef's have a great interest in fighting back big agra and walmart cornering food production, forcing small farmers out of business with "unbeatable" prices for produce. despite some flurry in a few media outlets that walmart was weighing gmo labels, they responded that it would be too confusing for the poor, stupid consumer to have to think about, so they decided against it. "'Currently there is a proliferation of eco or trust labels out there that are delivering a confusing message to consumers.'He says Wal-Mart wants to be careful about what labels it allows on its products to provide accurate information to consumers while not increasing costs, “We have to decide what are the right labels on the right products."”http://www.hoosieragtoday.com/index.php/2013/02/27/commodity-classic-coveragegmo-labels-not-welcome-at-wal-mart/

also read
 "In the News: Chefs Speak Out Against Fracking, How Did GMO Wheat End Up in Oregon?, Japan and South Korea Ban U.S. Wheat Imports, Ben & Jerry’s Plans to Eliminate GMO Ingredients

 Well-known chefs, Mario Batali and Bill Telepan spoke about the dangers of fracking (specifically within our food system), in Thursday’s New York Daily News. They urged Governor Cuomo — who has been a huge read-chefs-for-marcellus-event-frackingproponent of NY State agriculture — to “serve food, not fracking.”  Chef Batali and Chef Telepan, along with myself and many other chefs, restaurateurs, farmers, brewers, vintners, and other food professionals, have come together to protect our regional foodshed from the dangers of hydraulic fracturing for natural gas (fracking) through the campaign, Chefs for the Marcellus.  Please get involved by signing a letter to Governor Cuomo asking him to ban fracking in New York State..."
from ieatgreen.com

or read Forbes ridiculing food activism as new agey, when really the false promises of Monsanto and corporations are the real New Age platitudes for their money making schemes. people seek alternative cures, foods and ways of living not of new age fairy tale hippy love but out of a direct reaction to a toxic system and culture which has skyrocketed cancer and birth defect rates, obesity, and just about every disease you can think of with massive bee colony collapse, plastic oceans visible from space, toxic tap water and the systematic tyranny of every aspect of our lives from denying food labels to calling people who complain about anything that conflicts with business as usual as terrorists.

answering the term food elitists south bronx farmers market
 resistance is fertile

Moms Across America Appeal to Monsanto by Publishing an Open Letter and Coordinating Nationwide Events on July 4, 2013


 read

"Moms Across America are gathering around the country to spread awareness of GMOs because they have seen the health of their children improve when they remove genetically modified, or GM foods, from their children's diets. These peaceful demonstrations are being conducted throughout America because they believe every U.S. citizen has a right to know if GMO ingredients are used in the foods they choose to feed their families.
•Many mothers have reported that their children fare worse health-wise than children from other countries. The notable difference is that 80% of this nation's food contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs). (2)
•Today 1 out of 3 American children are overweight or obese since GMOs have been introduced. (3)
•1 out of 3 American children now have allergies, autism/ADHD, asthma, or auto-immune disorders. (4)
•These Moms see firsthand that when they take their children off GMOs, and feed them organic food, their symptoms either disappear or dramatically improve.
Today, many people know a child affected by food allergies, asthma, or autism. Moms Across America sees that the future and potential of an entire generation of children is being stolen from them because of the impact to their health from GMOs. This is why the MAA group is publishing an open letter to Monsanto, the leading agricultural and chemical corporation in the United States. Historically, such a letter has never been issued by Moms to any corporation in the world, to date.
This growing group of mothers question the intentions of biotechnology corporations like Monsanto. Despite continued rhetoric that GMO technology intends to feed the world, countries have continually rejected GM foods. (5) MAA understands the intention to put insecticides into the food our nation eats was to reduce the quantity of insecticides sprayed on the food consumed."

 we post this entire article its that good

How you can help prevent another mass bumble bee die-off

from Treehugger.com 

Jaymi Heimbuch
Last week we wrote about the terrible news of the largest mass bumble bee killing, which happened in an Oregon parking lot. The cause was determined to be the spraying of Safari, a pesticide, on 55 trees around a Target parking lot. The pesticide was used for cosmetic reason, and possibly -- though this is still under investigation -- against the label guidelines for use. Over 50,000 bumble bees, along with many bees, ladybugs and other insects, were found dead and dying. While we can't magic them back to life, there are things we can do to help pollinators and move a few steps closer to not allowing this to happen again.
The Xerces Society writes, "Many of you have contacted us outraged over the mass killing of bumble bees from pesticide poisoning in Wilsonville, OR. You have the power to protect bumble bees and other pollinators from pesticides."
Two things you can do right now is to first participate in the Bring Back the Pollinators campaign. The campaign aims to make more yards and gardens safe environments for pollinators -- pesticide free and filled with flowers that attract pollinators. In 2005, NASA did a study showing that 49,000 square miles of the US is covered in lawns, making it the largest irrigated crop in the country. Imagine if all that was converted to pesticide-free pollinator habitat, from flower gardens to fruit and vegetable patches. Bees and butterflies might once again have a fighting chance.
The second thing you can do right now to help pollinators is to memorize this word: Neonicotinoids. Now avoid any product with them in it. As Xerces Society notes:
"Neonicotinoids are a group of insecticides that are used widely on farms, as well as around our homes, schools, and city landscapes. Used to protect against sap-sucking and leaf-chewing insects, neonicotinoids are systemic, which means they are absorbed by the plant tissues and expressed in all parts, including nectar and pollen. Unfortunately, bees, butterflies, and other flower-visiting insects are harmed by the residues. Extremely concerning is the prolific inclusion of these insecticides in home garden products. Home garden products containing neonicotinoids can legally be applied in far greater concentrations in gardens than they can be on farms – sometimes at concentrations as much as 120 times as great which increases the risk to pollinators."
Doesn't sound like something you want to use, right? Especially when a little soapy water can just as easily take care of a problem like aphids, without the deadly consequences for beneficial insects. The group has a list of what products contain neonicotinoids so you can more easily avoid using them in your garden.
Meanwhile, Grist notes that the Xerces Society is sending letters "to local and state agriculture departments across the country, urging them to end the use of neonicotinoid insecticides on trees, lawns, and for other cosmetic purposes on lands that they manage." There is already such a ban in place in Europe.

Pesticide banned following 50,000 bee deaths



HILLSBORO, OR (KPTV) - article and video
More than a dozen pesticides are now banned in Oregon after 50,000 bees were found dead in a Target store parking lot earlier this month.
The bees were killed at the Target store in Wilsonville in mid-June.
Pesticide poisoning from a product known as Safari caused the bumblebee deaths, officials said, and that product is one of several now banned by the state.
A week after the Wilsonville bee deaths, hundreds of bees were also found dead around a tree in Hillsboro. City officials said the tree had been sprayed with Safari earlier in the year, but they haven't ruled Safari as the cause of the deaths.
The trees in question in both Wilsonville and Hillsboro have now received a mesh covering to make sure bees can't reach them.
To prevent another bee killing, the Oregon Department of Agriculture is also temporarily banning the use of 18 pesticide products. Pesticides containing dinotefuran can no longer be used on plants, or at least not until the ban is lifted.
ODA officials said they're acting "in an abundance of caution" in issuing the ban. Director Katy Coba said she hopes the decision minimizes the potential for more bee deaths connected to pesticide products while the state continues to investigate and gather information

Toxic Pesticides Found in Traditional Chinese Herbs


"Traditional herbs sold in stores in China are full of pesticides that far exceed safe levels, tests by Greenpeace have shown.
The environmental group tested more than 60 samples of herbs from Chinese medicine retailers, including Tongrentang, a large traditional Chinese medicine company. Some of these health supplements were found to contain levels of chemicals dozens or hundreds of times more than the European safety standards.
Of the tested herbs, 74 percent contained pesticide residue. The worst sample they found was san qi flower sold in Beijing that contained 39 different pesticides. Honeysuckle and wolfberry sold in Hong Kong each contained 12 different pesticides.
Some of these chemicals have been illegal for years."


read

Secret flower planter threatened with arrest if he doesn't stop planting flowers

How to make seed balls:


(NaturalNews) The real estate department from Washington's Metro Transit system has recently become aware of unauthorized flowers springing up in planter boxes on public property. Along the north side of their Dupont Circle station, hundreds of mysterious morning glories and other flowers have been coming up in planter boxes along the Metro's north escalators.

Metro found out who the secret flower planter was when they received a polite letter on June 3 written by the flower planter himself, Henry Docter. Henry sent a letter asking permission to continue caring for hundreds of flowers he had planted a week earlier at the Metro transit system.

"Arrests, fines, and imprisonment" for planting flowers

Sherwin Smith, Tennessee Official, Says Water Quality Complaints Could Be 'Act Of Terrorism'

we can see the mindset that any dissent, any questions, any comments are perceived as a threat. Even if Harvard says fluoride reduces children's IQ
 any complaint about it or other problems in the water might get you a pretty unsavory label from certain quarters.

huffington post article

"A Tennessee state official reportedly told residents who were concerned about dirty drinking water that complaining about water quality could be considered "an act of terrorism."
The controversial comment was made by Sherwin Smith, the deputy director of the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation's (TDEC) Division Of Water Resources, during a May 29 meeting organized by Tennessee state Rep. Sheila Butt (R-Columbia).
"You need to make sure that when you make water quality complaints you have basis," Smith said, according to audio obtained by Statewide Organizing For Community eMpowerment (SOCM), a Knoxville-based civic action group. "Because federally, if there's no water quality issues, that can be considered, under Homeland Security, an act of terrorism."
The comments came during a discussion over poor water quality in Tennessee's Maury County, where residents have said people have gotten sick from drinking the water.
In January, the town of Mt. Pleasant, Tenn. issued a "boil water" notice to residents due to health risks posed by bacteria in the water, Bobby Nutt, the town's public works director, told The Columbia Daily Herald at the time."

Tanzania Told to Sever Link With Monsanto

no wonder they dont want there, they dont listen to U2 or give a damn what Bono says about GMO  






"Tanzanian President Jakaya Kikwete is an enthusiastic supporter of Monsanto, but now pressure is mounting on his government to reject GMO technologies as solutions to end hunger
Normally Tanzanian lawmakers would 'prove' their radicalism by blasting rival parties, state authorities, public corporations or ministers for shoddy work done or millions that go missing. They would hardly ever take a swipe at a multinational corporation, much less an American one.
Yet that is what happened recently when Hon Halima Mdee (Chadema) called upon the government to sever its relations with the international seed company Monsanto, which is a major stakeholder in the country's campaign for a green revolution.
She reminded the government that the firm had caused farmers misery and suffering in many countries, including the US, where it is based."

Monsanto's Unapproved GMO Wheat Stored In Colorado For 7 Years, Investigators Say

 this is looking pretty shady, as we said, instead of waiting for approval and alienating the world markets that refuse USA wheat, just release it and infect the world's crops and then everyone will be forced to buy into the rest of the products and sprays needed for GMO production.


By Carey Gillam
read
June 28 (Reuters) - Monsanto Co's unapproved, experimental genetically engineered wheat, which is feared to have potentially contaminated U.S. wheat supplies after it was found growing in an Oregon field this spring, was kept in a U.S. government storage facility until at least late 2011, according to documents obtained by Reuters.

The revelation that the seed for the controversial genetically engineered wheat was kept viable in a Colorado storage facility as recently as a year and a half ago comes as the U.S. government is investigating how the strain of experimental wheat wound up growing in an Oregon field this spring.

Over $30M spent last year on lobbying to keep GMOs hidden in foods

(NaturalNews) Guess who spends the most money lobbying on agricultural lobbying? If you answered, "Monsanto," you're correct. Most of their efforts, of course, are focused on lobbying for GMOs -- to keep them legal and keep them hidden in foods.

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Genetically Modified Foods: Why One Expert Wants Them Out Of Your Kitchen

READ



"You most likely ate a genetically modified food today and didn’t know it. Once the stuff of science fiction, food genetically manipulated in the laboratory, has become more commonplace than people realize and is not identifiable by label. The United States is the largest manufacturer of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and, unlike the European Union, currently allows them to be produced without an established, broad-based set of safeguards, regulations or labeling requirements."

“There have been multiple studies linking this increasing pesticide exposure to childhood illness and ADHD. Some studies have even shown a link to tumor increase. We see in vitro evidence that GMOs may increase allergies and antibiotic resistance. The large amounts of pesticides and herbicides must go somewhere; they’re destroying the soil and oftentimes get into groundwater. We are seeing a huge decline in honeybees and other creatures that help pollinate plants.

Study: Monsanto GMO food claims probably false

New research reveals that plant breeding, not genetic engineering, is responsible for yield increases in US crops 

from Salon 



Oops. The World Food Prize committee’s got a bit of egg on its face—genetically engineered egg. They just awarded the World Food Prize to three scientists, including one from Syngenta and one from Monsanto, who invented genetic engineering because, they say, the technology increases crop yields and decreases pesticide use. (Perhaps not coincidentally, Monsanto and Syngenta are major sponsors of the World Food Prize, along with a third biotech giant, Dupont Pioneer.)
Monsanto makes the same case on its website, saying, “Since the advent of biotechnology, there have been a number of claims from anti-biotechnology activists that genetically modified (GM) crops don’t increase yields. Some have claimed that GM crops actually have lower yields than non-GM crops… GM crops generally have higher yields due to both breeding and biotechnology.”
But that’s not actually the case. A new peer-reviewed study published in the International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability examined those claims and found that conventional plant breeding, not genetic engineering, is responsible for yield increases in major U.S. crops. Additionally, GM crops, also known as genetically engineered (GE) crops, can’t even take credit for reductions in pesticide use. The study’s lead author, Jack Heinemann, is not an anti-biotechnology activist, as Monsanto might want you to believe. “I’m a genetic engineer. But there is a different between being a genetic engineer and selling a product that is genetically engineered,” he states.
The study compared major crop yields and pesticide use in North America, which relies heavily on GE crops, and Western Europe, which grows conventionally bred non-GE crops. The study’s findings are important for the future of the U.S. food supply, and therefore for the world food supply since the U.S. is a major exporter of many staple crops.

Species Alteration: Is GMO Rewiring our DNA?: THIS HAS BEEN SATAN’S GOAL ALL ALONG-GENETIC ARMAGEDDON IS HERE NOW!


 


by Christina Sarich
 naturalsociety.com
"New studies in cell research are bringing up some alarming new questions concerning GMOs, and one of them in particular makes liver failure or cancer seem like child’s play compared to the garish possibilities that arise when we start to look at how genetically modified foods likely affect our DNA.
Let’s get one thing straight, first. All kinds of things can alter our DNA, for the better or worse. Bruce Lipton, a pioneering biology scientist, proved that emotions can change our DNA; research has shown that even exercise or chemotherapy can alter our DNA; ancient cultures have known that sound can affect our DNA; and the newest research states that we aren’t relegated to a specific destiny because of our genes, but it seems our brains are being rewired via DNA to become ‘new humans.’
Our DNA contains two strands of nucleotides that make up its stair-like structure. Each nucleotide contains one of four bases (adenine, thymine, guanine, cytosine) a phosphate group and a sugar molecule. The bases contain nitrogen, which bond in very specific ways. In one species the way the four bases connect to each other are very different than how they will organize in another."

read the rest

GMOs fooling the world for 20 years


  excellent article
Myth: GE crops will end world hunger.
Fact: GE crops have nothing to do with ending world hunger, no matter how much GE spokespeople like to expound on this topic. Three comments give the lie to their claim: FAO data clearly show that the world produces plenty of food to feed everyone, year after year. Yet hunger is still with us. That’s because hunger is not primarily a question of productivity but of access to arable land and resources. Put bluntly, hunger is caused by poverty and exclusion.
Today’s commercial GE crops weren’t designed to fight hunger in the first place. They aren’t even mainly for human consumption. Practically the entire area planted to GE crops consists of soybeans, corn, canola and cotton. The first three of these are used almost exclusively to make cattle feed, car fuel and industrial oils for the United States and Europe, while cotton goes into clothing.
More damning, there appears to be an iniquitous cause-and-effect relationship between GE crops and rural hunger. In countries like Brazil and Argentina, gigantic “green deserts” of corn and soybeans invade peasants’ land, depriving them – or outright robbing them – of their means of subsistence. The consequence is hunger, abject poverty and agrotoxin poisoning for rural people. The truth is that GE crops are edging out food on millions of hectares of fertile farmland.
In the year GMO seeds were first planted, 800 million people worldwide were hungry. Today, with millions of hectares of GMOs in production, one billion are hungry. When exactly do these crops start “feeding the world”?
Myth: GE crops are more productive.
Fact: Not true. Look at the data from the country with the longest experience of GMOs: the United States. In the most extensive and rigorous study, the Union of Concerned Scientists analyzed 20 years of GE crops and concluded that genetically engineered herbicide-tolerant soybeans and corn are no more productive than conventional plants and methods. Furthermore, 86% of the corn productivity increases obtained in the past 20 years have been due to conventional methods and practices. Other studies have found GE productivity to be lower than conventional.
Crop plants are complex living beings, not Lego blocks. Their productivity is a function of multiple genetic and environmental factors, not some elusive “productivity gene.” You can’t just flip a genetic switch and turn on high productivity, nor would any responsible genetic engineer make such a claim. Even after all this time, GE methods are quite rudimentary. Proponents of the technology count it a success if they manage to transfer even two or three functional genes into one plant.
The bottom line is that 20 years and untold millions of dollars of research have resulted in a grand total of two marketable traits: herbicide tolerance and Bt pest resistance (see below). Neither has anything to do with productivity.
Myth: GE crops will eliminate agrichemicals.
Fact: It’s the reverse: GE crops increase the use of harmful agrichemicals. Industry people try to put this myth over by touting the “Bt gene” from the Bacillus thuringiensis bacteria, which produces a toxin lethal to some corn and cotton worms. The plants produce their own pesticide, supposedly obviating the need to spray. But with such large areas planted to Bt monocultures, the worms have quickly developed resistance to Bt; worse, a host of formerly unknown secondary pests now have to be controlled with more chemicals.
The other innovation trumpeted by the “genetically modified corporations” consists of plants that can withstand high doses of herbicides. This allows vast monocultures to be sprayed from the air, year after year on the same site. It’s a convenience for industrial farmers that has abetted the spectacular expansion of soybeans in recent years. Thirty-years-ago, there were no soybeans in Argentina; now they take up half the country’s arable land. Concurrently, the amount of the herbicide glyphosate sprayed in Argentina has skyrocketed from eight million litres in 1995 to over 200 million litres today – a 20-fold increase, all for use in GE soy production.

read the whole article

Monsanto faces another class action suit



Dan Brown, Kansas Wheat Farmer, Files Lawsuit Against Monsanto Over GMO Crop



"WICHITA, Kan. (AP) — Another lawsuit has been filed against seed giant Monsanto over last month's discovery of an isolated field of genetically engineered wheat in Oregon.
Kansas wheat farmer Dan Brown sued Monsanto on Tuesday on behalf of himself and potentially thousands of other growers. The Seward County resident's lawsuit is seeking class-action status.
It's at least the third lawsuit filed against St. Louis-based Monsanto this month over the release of the experimental wheat. Kansas farmer Ernest Brown individually sued the company, and another lawsuit seeking class-action status was filed in Washington on behalf of growers of soft white wheat.
Monsanto reiterated Wednesday that none of the genetically modified wheat entered the commercial market. The company says no legal liability exists given the care undertaken, and it vowed to present a vigorous defense."

read

With Recent Victories, Movement to Label GMOs Gains Steam


With Recent Victories, Movement to Label GMOs Gains Steam 

 

"More than six months after a big defeat in California, the movement to label foods containing genetically modified organisms appears to be picking up steam across the country.
In the past three weeks, Connecticut and Maine passed labeling bills, the U.S. Department of Agriculture for the first time approved a non-GMO label claim for meat products, Chipotle began voluntarily labeling menu items containing GMO ingredients online, and, perhaps most notably, the Senate Appropriations Committee voted last week to give the U.S. Food and Drug Administration funding to label genetically modified salmon if the agency approves the fish.
These are all small steps compared to what California’s Proposition 37 would have accomplished – since the populous state consumes  a significant share of groceries in the United States, some speculated that food giants would have reformulated their products to avoid creating two supply chains – but the string of victories has many in the so-called ‘Right to Know’ movement confident the tide is turning in their favor.
“It’s simply a matter of time,” said Scott Faber, who serves as executive director of Just Label It, a national advocacy campaign. Faber, who is vice president of government affairs at the Environmental Working Group, used to be a lobbyist for the Grocery Manufacturers Association, which actively lobbies against mandatory labeling initiatives."

read

Bottle Gourd Herbs at Historic Penn Farm: Photo Update

Bottle Gourd Herbs at Historic Penn Farm is located in New Castle, DE.  For local residents interested in chemical-free, ecologically-grown produce, we are pleased to offer you harvests from our humble permaculture demonstration farm.  We have a weekly mailing list that includes updates from the farm, a weekly harvest list, upcoming workshops and events, and more.  To sign up, visit http://www.depermaculture.com and enter your email address in the mailing list subscription field on the homepage.  For assistance, write to us at info@depermaculture.com

For the end of June we are currently offering baby arugula, mixed heirloom salad greens, bright lights swiss chard and culinary herbs (including rosemary, sage, parsley, lemon balm, greek oregano, marjoram, and meditteranean spearmint) at competitive chemical-free prices - email for details.  Are you a cafe or restaurant owner, natural grocer or co-op?  We are happy to supply wholesale orders too.

Thank you to the following local businesses for supporting Bottle Gourd Herbs at Historic Penn Farm by sourcing our produce in their establishments: Fresh Thymes Cafe, Delaware Local Food Exchange and Spring Run Natural Foods.  Big up!

And now for a few photos of our growing crops:

Adding bio-active mineral amendments to newly double dug beds in May 2013.....


Same beds today, late June 2013.  Bed in foreground is planted to baby arugula, back further bed is planted to heirloom salad green blends, and the further back to the compost pile is planted to squashes, summer radishes and beans.
Our beautiful heirloom salad greens (grass not included!)
Our first heirloom bush beans bed.  Three different varieties (royal burgundy, provider and golden wax).  All in flower and starting to fruit.  Bed is interplanted with red beets and calendula.
Close-up of the royal burgundy bush beans beginning to fruit.
A bunch of our just-harvested bright lights swiss chard.
Our first summer squash to come to fruit.  Grown in a living mulch of dutch white clover.




Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Mankind: Death by Corporation

excellent article 

tracing the roles of corporate death merchants
By Dr Brian Moench, Truthout | Op-Ed 
"Enter Monsanto. Forbes Magazine gave Monsanto its "Company of the Year Award" in 2009. Perhaps it is no surprise that readers of Natural News overwhelming awarded Monsanto a slightly different award, "World's Most Evil Corporation." What has Monsanto done to achieve this lofty perch? None other than seek to monopolize the world's food supply with expensive genetically modified (GM) seeds that have to be purchased each year and require expensive and toxic pesticides, which Monsanto also happens to produce. It doesn't take the geniuses at Forbes magazine to figure out that if you own the rights to all the food grown everywhere, you literally rule the world.
In pursuing this business model, Monsanto has managed to do more damage to the world's food supply and public health than any other single entity. About 90 percent of all US-grown corn, soybeans, canola, and sugar beets are genetically modified versions, which means that virtually all processed food items contain at least one or more genetically modified ingredients. You simply cannot avoid Monsanto's genetically modified food, no matter how hard you may try.
Exactly none of the supposed benefits of GM crops - increased yields, more food production, controlled pests and weeds, reductions in chemical use in agriculture or drought-tolerant seeds - have actually materialized. The Global Citizen's report on the State of GMOs points out that, in fact, the opposite has occurred. GMOs have resulted in greater pesticide use and the predictable emergence of herbicide resistant super weeds. In fact, 130 types of weeds in 40 states are now herbicide-resistant, increasing costs, cutting yields and leading to the use of more powerful and increasingly toxic chemical herbicides.
Numerous studies with animals and humans call into serious question the safety of GMOs - even disregarding the added pesticide exposure. In particular, Monsanto's Bt toxin, the genes of a toxic bacteria inserted into the seed DNA of corn, soybeans, sugar beets, squash and cotton, kills insects by splitting open their stomachs when they bite on the plant. Monsanto claimed that Bt toxin is broken down in the human digestive system, so "don't worry, be happy." A new study shows that claim to be Monsanto propaganda. When humans eat Bt toxin, it transfers into the DNA of bacteria living inside our intestines, which continue to function like mini-pesticide factories. Blood samples from 93 percent of pregnant mothers and 80 percent of fetuses show the presence of active Bt toxin.
Studies in humans are limited, something much to Monsanto's liking. But numerous animal studies have linked Bt toxin and GMOs to allergic reactions, infertility, immune dysregulation, gastrointestinal and kidney disease, and accelerated aging (1).   There is circumstantial evidence in animals and humans that GMOs may be contributing to the epidemic of autism. Calling for a moratorium on GM foods, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) in 2009, citing several animal studies, concluded, "There is more than a casual association between GM foods and adverse health effects," adding, "GM foods pose a serious health risk in the areas of toxicology, allergy and immune function, reproductive health, and metabolic, physiologic and genetic health."  The consensus among scientists at the FDA was that GMOs are dangerous, but key Monsanto executives, appointed to federal agencies under multiple administrations, including Obama's, squashed that information. For example, Obama appointed Michael Taylor, Monsanto's former vice president, as food safety czar at the FDA.  That’s like having a tobacco executive crafting regulations on cigarettes.
Virtually every branch of the US government, including the Supreme Court and the World Bank, has acted as Monsanto's handmaiden, often times using taxpayer money to do so. Monsanto's ruthless business practices, high seed prices and vicious legal attacks have played a key role in the disappearance of small and medium-size farms, bankrupting small farmers and driving world agriculture further toward huge monocultures and complete control by a handful of agribusinesses and food-processing corporations. There is a growing epidemic among small farmers in many countries, especially India, where in the past 16 years, well over 250,000 have committed suicide, most of them small cotton farmers where Monsanto controls 95 percent of the cotton seed and makes its living off of suing farmers trapped in debt."

Hey Walmart! Pick on pickers your own size

 By Janet Mackay-Smith

 We get it, Walmart. You’re a giant company that can put its big ol’ boots on and stomp out local competition. But local farmers and farmers markets? C’mon!
A new TV commercial airing of late wants you to know where you can get the BEST PRODUCE ANYWHERE. Not your local grocery store. And certainly not your local farmers market -- if you’re lucky enough to have one in your town. No, it’s at Walmart. Aren’t you surprised? You're supposed to be.
And to demonstrate this point, the ad shows a fresh-faced Walmart representative showing up at a farmers market in Anytown, USA, encouraging customers to try the Walmart fresh produce. Not the stupid locally grown stuff.  The customers, of course, rave about the quality of the fruits and veggies, and one says something like, “I know where I’ll be getting my fresh produce from now on!”

5 Reasons a Monsanto Exec Does Not Deserve the World Food Prize

read the rest
1. No one knows how GMO food will affect our health.
A recent study found that pigs fed GMO corn and soy feed had a notably higher rate of severe stomach inflammation. A study published last September found that rats fed GMO corn developed tumors and died prematurely.
No extensive studies have yet been done on the effects of GMOs on humans. Some potential risks include the introduction of new allergens in our food supply and the development of antibiotic resistance.
2. Some insects are already evolving to become resistant to GMOs.
Rootworms are becoming resistant to GMO crops — disturbingly, as one of the”advantages” of GMOs was supposed to be that insecticides would not have to be used on them. Indeed, sales of corn insecticide made by Syngenta (the company that Chilton is a scientist at) more than doubled in 2012 as a result of “increased grower awareness” of rootworm resistance in the U.S.
3. Monsanto has contributed generously to the the World Food Prize Foundation.
In 2008, Monsanto gave the foundation a pledge of $5 million. The World Food Prize Foundation has also been previously criticized for favoring industrial agriculture; giving the prize to a Monsanto executive seems unlikely to change such criticism.
4. It is illegal to import GMOs to some parts of the world, due to concerns about their safety.
The European Union, Japan and other countries do not allow GMO seed or crops to enter their borders. The EU categorizes GMOs as “new foods” which must be subjected to extensive scientific testing on a case-by-case basis by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). After an illegal strain of GMO wheat was recently found on a farm in Oregon, Japan was so concerned that it suspended some wheat imports from the U.S.
GMO seed has been imported to and cultivated in countries in Africa and Asia (including India and China). But millions of small-scale farmers in Africa have repeatedly objected to using GMO crops and want their governments to ban them.
5. GMO crops could wipe out seed diversity.
Farmers in Africa are rejecting GMO crops not only because of the little that we know about them. As Million Belay and Ruth Nyambura write in the Guardian, small-scale African farmers are more than wary about how GMO crops could affect traditional farming practices developed over centuries.
Traditional African farming systems have indeed “developed an incredible diversity of seed varieties, which are able to deal with the multiple challenges of farming.” Many types of seeds have been bred for flavor and nutrition and have also “evolved with local pests and diseases and are adapted to different soils and weather patterns.” Using them, Belay and Nyambura emphasize, is “a far better strategy of resilience than developing a single crop that is bound to fail in the face of climate change.”
Even more, because companies like Monsanto make saving GMO seed illegal, small-scale farmers in Africa could face a huge dilemma. 80 percent of farmers in Africa save seed, say Belay and Nyambura, and “how are they supposed to protect the varieties they have developed, crossed and shared over generations from GM contamination?” Maintaining seed diversity and promoting healthy soil ecology are essential to “real food security” and a strategy more than worthy of recognition — maybe the World Food Prize Foundation will take note of such when choosing future prize recipients.


Choice of Monsanto Betrays World Food Prize Purpose, Say Global Leaders

read

"This statement is supported by 81 Councillors of the World Future Council, a network of global luminaries who "form a voice for the rights of future generations," and/or Laureates of the Right Livelihood Award, often called the Alternative Nobel. Supporters' names appear below."
2013-06-26-WFP_HuffPoImage.jpg In honoring the seed biotechnology industry, this year's World Food Prize -- to many, the most prestigious prize in food and agriculture -- betrays the award's own mandate to emphasize "the importance of a nutritious and sustainable food supply for all people."

Weed killer ingredient used on GMO crops found in a whole lot of urine

Weed killer ingredient used on GMO crops found in a whole lot of urine

 

" If you follow the biotech industry, you may have noticed the sector has been fielding its share of health concerns lately around genetically-modified crops. Results from a recent study by Friends of the Earth Europe showed that 44 percent of urine taken from European city-dwellers across 18 countries was contaminated with glyphosate. Glyphosate is the primary ingredient in Monsanto's weed-killer Roundup, and is also used widely in the United States. At high levels of exposure, the herbicide has been linked to cancer, Parkinson's and infertility. Researchers are especially concerned because the samples were taken from people who have never handled or used it. Glyphosate is used extensively on genetically modified crops which have been engineered to be resistant to this herbicide. [Source]"

 

 

 

GM Cabbage with Scorpion Poison Coming Soon

"Agribusiness is in a mad rush to take over the earth, and seems willing to stop at nothing. Coming soon is cabbage with scorpion poison engineered in every cell. Of course, they claim it’s safe and will result in less pesticide use, but history and logic say otherwise. Who will wake from the insane mating between Agribiz and GMOs?"
by Heidi Stevenson



"Get ready for genetically engineered cabbages that come complete with their own scorpion poison, just for you to eat. It’s touted as requiring less pesticide use and being, of course, completely safe. Close investigation, though, indicates that neither claim is likely true.
A pesticide made with scorpion poison genetically engineered into a virus was first tested back in 1994. Interestingly, the scientists who sprayed the test field wore full body suits to protect them from this “harmless” poison. One must wonder at just how safe it could be when the developers themselves don’t trust it more than that! Of course, the head of the trial, Professor David Bishop, insisted that the trial was safe—though he himself opted to take a vacation, rather than be there for it." read

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

High time India wakes up to the dangers of field trials of GM crops

Must Read:

 In the past fortnight, three international events of major significance have gone unnoticed in India. About 20 lakh people, in 52 countries of six continents, including 48 US states, took part in a peaceful but symbolically important ‘March Against Monsanto’—to protest the reckless proliferation of genetically modified (GM) food items. Russian President Vladimir Putin sent an unusually strong message to President Obama expressing ‘extreme outrage’ at the support being given to global seed and plant bio-genetic MNCs Syngenta and Monsanto—and in a rare display of diplomatic anger nearly refused to meet the visiting US Secretary of State. About the same time, GM wheat ‘volunteers’ were found growing in Oregon, US—GM wheat is not approved for planting in US; this could be a potential disaster for US farmers. It is astonishing that our media has not picked up these extraordinarily significant international developments, which could have major consequences in India, indeed to mankind. It is important to note that all these three events have a common name to connect them—Monsanto.
Putin’s concerns relate to the widely prevalent use of a class of “neuro-active insecticides ‘neo-nicotinoids’ by chemical giants, including Monsanto, Bayer and Dow.” Quoting a technical report, he cited ‘undisputed evidence’ that these are destroying our planet’s bee population, and left unchecked could destroy the world’s ability to feed its population. In Europe, in general, all GM crops are banned. Consumer rights groups in the US recently highlighted the “US State Department strategy to foist ‘pro-biotech’ policies on foreign governments”, especially to encourage field trials in developing countries. Clearly, India has been identified as a convenient ‘guinea pig’.

read the rest

EPA Raises Glyphosate Concentrations on Food Crops


readers 0f our blog (no comments?) will see that peer reviewed journals are almost daily publishing some horrible new finding on glyphosate. readers will often note that we reference the revolving door policy of the EPA and Monsanto and other corporations Monsanto EPA revolving Door
so its not surprising the  EPA Raises Glyphosate Concentrations on Food Crops. after Fukishima they response was simply to raise the acceptable levels of radiation.
They are raising the levels of glyphosate as weeds are developing a resistance requiring more and more sprayings. The same crops are grown in the same soils, or similar glyphosate ready abominations, and sprayed and sprayed until concentrations rise beyond the previous acceptable level. its is like a drug fiend or alcoholic needing to take more and more of their substance because they  have developed a tolerance.

"Last week the EPA let Monsanto raise the allowable concentrations of glyphosate on food crops, animal feed, and edible oils. The new regulation lets farmers use more of the chemical, which is the active ingredient in the herbicide Roundup.
Under the new regulation, forage and hay teff can contain up to 100 ppm (100,000 ppb) glyphosate; oilseed crops can contain up to 40 ppm (40,000 ppb) glyphosate, and root crops such as potatoes and beets can contain 6000 ppb glyphosate. Fruits can have concentrations from 200 ppb to 500 ppb glyphosate. These numbers are magnitudes higher than the levels some scientists believe are carcinogenic" From Food Poisoning Bulletin

drones? coming to a farm near you

yet again we inch closer to nightmare scenarios of robotic, post apocalyptic landscapes and surveillance state, so corporate-backed farmers can keep an eye on everything, never even having to expose themselves to their own poison and never touch the earth. they can just farm from their lawn ensconced lairs. the same data could be collected by going around in the field, but that would entail being connected to the land. but these farmer's don't bring their children around after they spray and put their crops in, nor do they want to walk around in their desolate fields, devoid of good and bad insects and plants and pollinators, with neat, trim rows of frankencrops. this is an inversion of the family sustainable farm, as the soil just gets depleted, saturated with toxins, and then producing only chemically pumped up feed crops that will bioaccumlate all their poisons in your dairy, meats and poultry. vote with your dollars and stopping buying corporate produce.

it is interesting to see Walmart making moves into produce hard. commercials abound where they take over some mom and pop looking produce stand and replace the produce they sell with walmart brand (though they are likely still shipped in from the same plantations, or corporate agrotoxic farms) and you can read a prophetic piece from 2011 here walmart taking over our food
 walmart vendetta against small farmers?
small farmers are not cashing in on walmart produce push
the collusion between corporations and revolving door politicians who work for companies, then as lawmakers, then back to the corporation or are appointed to the highest courts will also be fortified with advanced technologies and neocolonial business models. the globalization of food has wrecked local economies, one of the most poignant examples to us being the plight of dairy farmers in Jamaica, who can not produce milk cheaper than the cargo tankers that bring it in and literally flood the markets pushing the price so low that they can not compete (see excellent documentary Life and Debt embedded above). It's the same model of taking a loss on batteries and other items so that local hardware stores can not even inch by on some quick, small profit but high volume sales. So two of the world's most ruthless corporations are cornering the world's food and seed supply (and water and land resources) and importing the third world to America via cultural genocide, a complete abandonment in investing in infrastructure, education and pledging utter fidelity to corporate pirates that will literally loot and plunder every asset, forest and field for every dollar. unbeatable takes on a new meaning. these are beta tests of larger programs to acclimate the omnipresent all watching eye. it might sound crazy but maybe they want to kill off the bees so farmers will be forced to buy robotic bees and pollinator robobees because they use local gestapos to seize and kill bees that are resistant to Monsanto's Round Up, so don't forget about this: Illinois illegally seizes bees resistant to Monsanto’s Roundup; Kills remaining Queens



Drones and Farming:

read here

and

here